Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:30

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Club World Cup: Qualified and eliminated teams - FIFA
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sapiente nemo autem perspiciatis.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What sexual fantasies do you have?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What is the definite integral of x^x from 0 to 2?
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Here’s why exercise is so important if you’re a cancer survivor - The Washington Post
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.